From fd8b36eb1cc9c9c24a10c1a21781d02cbade3480 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Luke Barnard <luke@matrix.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:09:29 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Use React.PureComponent instead of reimplementing it
---
src/components/views/rooms/DNDRoomTile.js | 13 +------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/components/views/rooms/DNDRoomTile.js b/src/components/views/rooms/DNDRoomTile.js
index ce867ef3..d32ecbbb 100644
--- a/src/components/views/rooms/DNDRoomTile.js
+++ b/src/components/views/rooms/DNDRoomTile.js
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ import RoomTile from 'matrix-react-sdk/lib/components/views/rooms/RoomTile';
import classNames from 'classnames';
-export default class DNDRoomTile extends React.Component {
+export default class DNDRoomTile extends React.PureComponent {
constructor() {
super();
this.getClassName = this.getClassName.bind(this);
@@ -33,17 +33,6 @@ export default class DNDRoomTile extends React.Component {
});
}
- shouldComponentUpdate(nextProps, nextState) {
- // Do a shallow comparison of the props that we pass through (there is no
- // state to check).
- // NB: We might want to ignore changes to index in future if reordering
- // occurs (all indices of all tiles in the sublist will change).
- if (Object.keys(nextProps).some((k) => nextProps[k] !== this.props[k])) {
- return true;
- }
- return false;
- }
-
render() {
const props = this.props;